5 Jan
2007
5 Jan
'07
7:52 a.m.
Hello Yitzchak, Thursday, January 4, 2007, 4:25:06 PM, you wrote:
The other is awkwardness in extending the capabilites of ST. For that, I would propose that the function "unsafeRunST" be added to the library.
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
this function exists, but named unsafeIOtoST.
That wasn't what I had in mind, because it forces the thread parameter to take the specific value RealWorld.
this parameter don't have any "physical" meaning at runtime. i still think that it is just what you mean. what other meaning may have unsafeRunST operation? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com