
30 Dec
2007
30 Dec
'07
11:39 a.m.
On 30 Dec 2007, at 10:14 AM, Cristian Baboi wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:49:16 +0200, Jonathan Cast
wrote: On 29 Dec 2007, at 5:01 AM, Cristian Baboi wrote:
By portable I mean: works on the same machine, with the same OS, but with different Haskell implementation.
Ah, you can't. But, again, what are you trying to do? Re- compiling your software for each implementation seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do, given the differences between them.
Recompiling my software will not save a function created by the software at runtime.
Which is a different problem than the one solved by dynamic linking. Again, why do you want to do this? jcc