26 Aug
2008
26 Aug
'08
4:15 a.m.
2008/8/26 Deborah Goldsmith
It sounds like the properties you want are "Case" and "General Category". Maybe the spec should be more explicit on exactly how the definitions map onto Unicode properties, so there is no ambiguity.
This is proposed for Haskell'. http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/UnicodeInHaskellSource says: "The report should at least be absolutely clear about which Unicode character properties (N, Ll, Lu, Sm, etc.) correspond to which lexical class in the syntax." I don't know if there's any difference in how current Haskell compilers handle this. Andy