14 Aug
2008
14 Aug
'08
2:58 p.m.
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Andrew Coppin wrote:
The naming of cats is a difficult matter...
Ahem. So as you may have noticed, we seem to have a profusion of packages all called "binary" or something dangeriously similar. There's also several "MD5" packages. I could point out a few others. So what I'm wondering is... Do we have a formal convention for the naming of packages and/or the naming of the modules they contain?
There is a page on the Wiki which lists several common top-level module names. Unfortunately www.haskell.org seems to be down currently.
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Hierarchical_module_names