Re: [Haskell-cafe] Floyd Warshall performance (again)

16 Apr 2010

      Hi Bulat,
...
ghc low-level code optimization cannot be compared with best modern C
compilers that's result of 20 years of optimization. ghc generates
machine code in rather simple idiomatic way, so it should be compared
to non-optimizing C compiler
Sure. But I was curious if to see whether there was some optimization
I had missed, seeing as other similarly low level programs, such as
the nsieve benchmark of the language shootout, or the word counting
program, manage to run within a few percentage points of C if not
faster. Since this program doesn't use any features specific to
functional programming, such as higher order functions, and mostly
just calls out to imperative primitives of GHC not implemented in
Haskell (such as unsafeRead and unsafeWrite), I would have thought
that the gap in runtimes might have been smaller. Fortunately for me,
using the FFI is really quite easy so for the actual problem I am
trying to solve I just call out to a C implementation of the Floyd
Warshall algorithm.

I forgot to paste the source code for the C program. FWIW, here it is!

#include 
#include 

#define SIZE 1500

#define MIN(x, y) (x < y ? x : y)

void fw(int size, int *matrix)
{
#define M(x,y) matrix[x*size+y]
	for (int k = 0; k < size; k++) {
		for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
			for (int j = 0; j < size; j++) {
				M(i, j) = MIN(M(i, j), M(i, k) + M(k, j));
			}
		}
	}
}

static int *matrix;

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
        matrix = malloc(sizeof(int)*SIZE*SIZE);
	if(!matrix) exit(1);
	fw(SIZE, matrix);
	return 0;
}

-- Mathieu

Re: [Haskell-cafe] Floyd Warshall performance (again)

Mathieu Boespflug