2 Aug
2007
2 Aug
'07
11:29 p.m.
Neil Mitchell
I think this is a fantastic idea, please do so!
Okay, I'll do it then. If I have a good weekend, perhaps I'll volunteer a talk at AngloHaskell after all! :) So what about syntax? I agree with your objections, so we've got ( <- expr ) -- makes sense, and I think it's unambiguous ``expr`` -- back-ticks make sense for UNIX shell scripters The first is something Simon Peyton-Jones came up with (probably on-the- fly) at OSCON, and I rather like it a lot; but I'm concerned about ambiguity. The latter seems sensible as well. Any other ideas? -- Chris Smith