
While you're at it, maybe whitelisting cpphs would be nice as well =).
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Michael Snoyman
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Vincent Hanquez
wrote: On 12/13/2012 12:51 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
I think that's a great idea. I just implemented this on PackDeps:
http://packdeps.haskellers.com/licenses
As with all features on that site, I'll be happy to deprecate it as soon as Hackage incorporates the feature in the future.
awesome Michael !
However i think ithis shouldn't take dependencies from tests and benchmarks. This doesn't make differences for the "overall" license that the library "exposes".
-- Vincent
Hmm, that's a good point. I'll admit I hadn't really thought this through, but I can actually see an argument going both ways on this:
* Viral licenses won't actually affect you if they're just used for test suites. * But company lawyers will probably be nervous about it anyway.
Nonetheless, I think you have the right of it. Unless people say otherwise, I'm going to implement Vincent's change.
Michael
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Felipe.