Hello Gregory, Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 5:17:01 PM, you wrote: no. additional threads are launched for i/o system and, as you requested by -N2 for haskell workload. but ghc don't auto-parallelize your code. it's a bit too hard, since making too much threads (e.g. one for every addition) will make bookkeeping too heavy and it's impossible to automatically deduce how much operations each computation will require. instead, you are provided with 'par' primitive to show compiler explicitly what parts to run in parallel
One of the things I liked about Haskell was the notion of pure functions and the fact that they can be, in theory, automatically parallelized on multicore hardware. I think this will become a huge deal in a few years as cores multiply. My question is simply this: under GHC is this what really happens with, say a mapping over a pure function. Yes, I compiled with --threaded and am using the +RTS -N2 options on my dual core machine. Here's the code I wrote as a speed test. It just doesn't seem any faster with -N2. Using the ps command I found that multiple threads are indeed launched (this is Linux) but all but one show as being in a state of waiting for some event to finish (the ps output flags them all 'Sl'.
main = do rg <- getStdGen let rs = take 10000000 $ randomRs (1::Int,100000::Int) rg rs'= map (\n -> n*n) rs print rs'
-- Best regards, Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin@gmail.com