
Well, to be fair, that webpage has quite a handful of red flags. Too vague, the budget doesn't quite add up for the things you plan to do (or for the investor names you drop), far too many investors (keeping them happy must be like herding cats), no roadmap, no "we achieved this and plan to achieve that in the next two years", 100% unrealistic ideas about entering competition (photonics or no, you'll need to build nanoscale chips, and with your current budget you have 0% chance that this will work - leaves one wondering how serious that part is, and by attribution, how serious the rest of the page is). I might be interested if I were at the beginning of my career, and were able to take risks because there's time to switch to something boring with a good income. Of course I might be totally wrong :-) But paint me a sceptic here. Am 01.02.20 um 23:13 schrieb Krystal Maughan:
Of course not. Algorithmic Bias is still a hot topic of research in AI; we definitely haven't figured that out yet. AI is definitely *not* for "all the things".
Best, Krystal
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 17:10, Jack Kelly
mailto:jack@jackkelly.name> wrote: Ben Franksen
mailto:ben.franksen@online.de> writes: > Am 31.01.20 um 01:19 schrieb David Banas: >> https://www.luminouscomputing.com/ > Quoting from that page: > """ > AI should be deployed to every product we interact with on a daily basis. > """ > Am I the only one how is horrified when they read something like this?
Beware he who thinks he has found the universal hammer.