Stephen Tetley wrote:
I suspect the difference between the ML module system vs. typeclasses will be as important as lazy vs. strict. As a style point, Ocaml programmers don't seem too prone to combinator mania - so I think golf is a bit less popular over there.
Both the lack of laziness and the value restriction can sometimes force combinator definitions to be eta-expanded, which I think makes this style of programming much less attractive. Cheers, Ganesh =============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html ===============================================================================