
11 Jul
2016
11 Jul
'16
11:33 a.m.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Stephen Tetley
On 11 July 2016 at 13:54, David Fox
wrote: When I mentioned some of this, I was told "different data structures for different purposes", which sort of makes sense, but honestly if Haskell
is a
language where you have to sit down and choose a representation every time you want to build some text, I get a bit discouraged.
Don't C# and Java have StringBuilder classes (different to their regular String types) for this as well?
Maybe imperative OO is also antithetical to efficient strings...
Probably.