
10 Sep
2005
10 Sep
'05
4:15 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:40:05PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Nils,
Friday, September 02, 2005, 10:47:05 AM, you wrote:
NAD> Compile your program with -prof -auto-all (make sure you have the
NAD> I tried this out under GHC 6.4/Linux and got a segmentation fault NAD> instead of a stack trace. Under GHC 6.2.2 it seemed to work, though.
this error is already fixed in current pre-6.4.1 version
I'm using a 2005/9/3 version of 6.4.1 and running into situations where the "stack trace" has function A calling function B, where when I look at the code, A never calls B. Is this normal? Is it some side-effect of laziness? It sure makes the traces a lot less useful. Frederik -- http://ofb.net/~frederik/