Re: [Haskell-cafe] HSpec vs Doctest for TDD

Well, for me TDD seems to be a poor substitute for type safety. And I specifically mean the level of type safety Haskell provides. In other languages TDD could be a good thing (although I value explorative programming too much), but in Haskell I think it's a waste of time. Отправлено с iPad

24 июня 2014 г., в 22:55, Gautier DI FOLCO написал(а):

Hi all,

I'm a huge fan of TDD (Test-Driven Development) et I used to use tools such as RSpec (Ruby). So naturally, I looked to HSpec, but it seems not idiomatic in Haskell. I have a bunch of questions: - Do you do TDD? - Which tools do you use? - Is doctest "better" (in some senses) than HSpec? Why? - Are HSpec and Doctest complementary? If so, in which case do you use one or another? - Is there some Haskell-specific good practices do to TDD?

Thanks in advance for your lights. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe