
14 Jul
2007
14 Jul
'07
3:57 p.m.
ListT IO (http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/ListTDoneRight) On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 21:34 +0200, Hugh Perkins wrote:
Well, can you provide an example of an implementation of bind that satisfies an intuitive definition of bind but does not satisfy the monad laws?
On 7/14/07, Derek Elkins
wrote: -Documentation- damn well better have the monad laws. Something is not a monad if it does not satisfy the monad laws. Furthermore, the monad laws are almost the only thing that -does- define monads.