29 Jan
2006
29 Jan
'06
11:05 a.m.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:57:14AM -0500, Cale Gibbard wrote:
Or if we're going to allow @ as an infix operator, we could use (@ pat), reminiscent of section notation. (exp @) of course would make no sense, seeing as there's no representation for patterns as values.
oooh. I like that. what fixity do you think @ should have? perhaps even lower than $... John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈