3 Aug
2010
3 Aug
'10
12:52 p.m.
So you can get the same function without needing to add a type-class. Or is it that you envisage other tolerance specifications besides Digit? If so, I wonder if this flexibility complicates your API unnecessarily. If you removed those type-classes and just stuck with Digits, the size of your API documentation would halve, and make the docs a lot more readable. Yes, I wanted to give the user the ability to create their own tolerance specifications. I figured that it was better to make it possible to do
On 8/3/10 3:27 AM, Neil Brown wrote: this within this library then to force the user to roll their own library if they turned out to need this functionality. Cheers, Greg