4 Aug
2007
4 Aug
'07
10:47 p.m.
On Aug 4, 2007, at 14:51 , Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Brandon,
Saturday, August 4, 2007, 8:44:46 PM, you wrote:
That would be why I'm using a language which lets me compose things in complex ways. And just once, abstracting it away into a library, which you seem to be missing.
and you hate 'do' syntax sugar?
Not particularly; I use both do and >>= (even intermixing them), although I'm uncertain that *teaching* Haskell should start with the "do" notation. Your point being? -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH