On 24 Sep 2009, at 20:10, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 19:48 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote:
That's great news for me, except: that's what I tried first, and I've just tried it again and it still doesn't seem to work for me. Perhaps I am doing something wrong...?
You're quite right, it got broken with the move to haddock2. The code in Cabal-1.6 skips the pre-processing when using haddock2, assuming haddock will handle it. In the current Cabal development version it works properly and I get the right output for your example.
Ah, righto. In that case, I won't shy away from LHS, and I'll be patient for the next Cabal release, or maybe even check out the development version. :-) Many thanks for your reassurance! Cheers, -Andy