7 Jan
2008
7 Jan
'08
6:42 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:40:29PM +0000, Andrew Coppin wrote:
Well, I was thinking more of using them for two things. One is for speculative work (i.e., doing work which we might need later - but don't bother unless there's cores going spare).
For (pure) speculative tasks, try Control.Parallel.par.
Mmm, OK. I'll try that. (I wasn't actually aware that STM is working yet...)
STM has been available for quite awhile, as early as GHC 6.4 if memory serves. Cheers, Spencer Janssen