19 Aug
2013
19 Aug
'13
10:39 a.m.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:40 AM, AntC
Would double-parens be too wild an idea?:
... ((CustId 47)) `extend` (CustName "Fred", Gender Male)
f ((CustId x)) = ...
instance C ((CustId Int)) ...
We'd have to avoid the double parens as in:
((meth obj) (double x))
Hi Anthony, This preprocessor I just threw together doesn't seem to suffers from those issues http://lpaste.net/91967. This kind of approach probably might let you steal T(..) while still allowing `T (..)' to refer to whatever is the original, though I think that would require working with the messier Annotated syntax tree. Regards, Adam