
5 Oct
2010
5 Oct
'10
10:30 a.m.
I see ... I think I understand now. hmmm ... I am little disappointed though - does that mean that "all the laziness" cool stuffs can actually be done using iterators(generators)? As in, but for the inconvenient syntax, you can do it all in - say java?
Yes. It would slightly easier in, say, C# or C++. I think 'D' achieves its implementation of the 'lazy' keyword using a similar approach. But I did not understand why you are disappointed ?