Hi Benjamin On 24 Nov 2009, at 02:35, Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:14:29 -0800 (PST), jfredett@gmail.com wrote:
Typef*ck: Brainf*ck in the type system. Johnny Morrice [23]showed us his implementation of everyone's favorite profane programming language... in the type system.
In general, if a programming language-related term contains what is generally regarded as a profane word as a component, for what kinds of written material should I prioritize accuracy vs. propriety?
Who gives a brain? More seriously, I worry that inaccuracy (other than blessed relief from tedious pedantry, of course) might ever be improper. Lots of arts academia write learned articles about filth, and it's no big deal when it's in quotation. That's the situation here, no? Perhaps use quotation marks just to be clear that the terminology is not of your making. But you should have no need of ASCII-art fig leaves. (Now, as far as *email* (e.g., HWN) is concerned, it makes sense to act like wise spammers the world over and disguise your true intentions from the automated filters. People from Scunthorpe must be really fed up doing that. I know they're fed up being used as an example, too. Sorry.) Yours ever Coqnor