13 Aug
2007
13 Aug
'07
12:27 p.m.
David Roundy wrote:
The only cost is that this syntax relies on the do notation, and thus makes the desugaring of that do notation slightly more complicated when used.
If I understand correctly, do blah f (do foo bar (<- action) ) blah has an ambiguity: which do-block is the action bound in? I can easily imagine myself being frustrated at having to refactor my code if the defined answer is not the one I want at the moment. Isaac