
30 Nov
2006
30 Nov
'06
8:58 a.m.
Quick feedback time... One comment people made in the Future of MissingH thread was that the name isn't very suggestive of what the library does. I'm planning to follow the advice of many people and split the major MissingH components off into smaller bits (ConfigParser, HVFS, etc). MissingH itself will then contain any small utility functions (probably mainly string and list-related) that for whatever reason aren't suitable to go into base. What should it be called? Should it keep the MissingH name? The alternative I've been thinking of is something like Haskell Utility Library (HUL). Ideas?