12 Apr
2006
12 Apr
'06
9:44 p.m.
On Apr 12, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Daniel McAllansmith wrote:
Averages of user time of five runs on an Athlon64 running 64bit linux:
64 0.1974 kern 0.2980 ones32 0.3240 table32 0.3754 table 0.3798
64 looks to be a good bit faster.
You didn't change anything in the ones32 algorithm did you? The other algorithms are taking roughly what they did last time, but ones32 seems consistently slower now.
Thanks for running it. Looks like "64" is worth the trouble. If the 32 bit wide algorithm is so fast, the 12 bit wide one must be blazingly fast. (See my other thread "The Marriage of Heaven and Hell.") I didn't make any changes to ones32 according to "diff." Cheers, David -------------------------------- David F. Place mailto:d@vidplace.com