
20 Feb
2007
20 Feb
'07
11:25 a.m.
On 20/02/07, David Roundy
It's rather a small function to bother putting in the libraries, and I think better expressed using map directly:
rmap fs x = map ($ x) fs
Yes. Now that I know the idiom, there's clearly little point in having a named function for it. Thanks, Paul.