20 Dec
2005
20 Dec
'05
6:19 p.m.
Hello Neil, Tuesday, December 20, 2005, 11:52:51 PM, you wrote: NM> Hi,
Hugs Interpreter only Suitable for learning. You'll need GHC for serious work.
NM> This is putting Hugs down quite a bit. I personally prefer Hugs, and NM> use it for serious work (including developing a Haskell compiler, and NM> 4 years of academic study and counting). for me, Hugs and especiall WinHugs is an amazing tool to develop programs that then will be compiled by GHC. they have a greatest level o compatibility while Hugs loads programs 10 times faster than GHCi and have much more helpful environment (especially WinHugs 2005) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulatz@HotPOP.com