
Hello Oleg,
Is there a good, somewhat up-to-date source of reference to find out what
exactly is different? Is it the STG paper from 1992 (“Implementing lazy
functional languages on stock hardware”)?
--
Best wishes,
Artem Pelenitstyn
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 10:17 Oleg Grenrus
Two data types are `Coercible` (as in Data.Coerce) if their representation in memory is the same: they are representiationally equivalent You ask for looser structural isomorphism, consider e.g.
data B b = B {-# UNPACK #-} !Int b
and
(Int, b)
The values of these types have quite different representation/memory layout.
- Oleg
On 25 Feb 2019, at 16.38, Georgi Lyubenov
wrote: Greetings!
Is there any reason behind/what is the reason behind ``` data A a b = A a b ``` and ``` (a, b) ```
not being coercible?
And in general all n-ary constructors not being coercible to one another?
Thanks in advance!
======= Georgi
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.