
I'm glad it worked, but I don't think it's doing what you think it's doing.
stack intentionally ignores cabal sandbox settings and the like so that the
tools don't step on each others' toes. I'm not sure what --add-source you
were using, but it's very unlikely that stack picked it up.
I am now quite curious what the problem was and how stack ended up just
working for this.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:32 PM, David Banas
Thanks to all, whom replied.
I found that a simple “stack install …” worked perfectly, as an alternative to “cabal install ...". Stack seems to have honored all the “cabal …” things I did in setting up my sandbox, including all my “cabal sandbox —add-source …” commands (5 in all). And, of course, it used the back-rev’d version of ghc I configured it (i.e. - stack) for.
That is SO neat that I can’t understand why it’s not a featured item in the Stack documentation. Thanks, Stack crew!
-db
On Sep 2, 2015, at 8:59 PM, Michael Snoyman
wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:37 AM, David Banas
wrote: Hi all,
How do I direct cabal to use an alternative (i.e. - not my system’s default) version of ghc, which I’ve installed, via stack?
I tried this:
stack exec cabal install ...
but got this:
cabal: Use of GHC's environment variable GHC_PACKAGE_PATH is incompatible with Cabal. Use the flag --package-db to specify a package database (it can be used multiple times).
Thanks, -db
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
We have a flag to working better with cabal, you can try:
stack exec --no-ghc-package-path -- cabal install
I'm under the impression that there are changes planned to cabal (possibly already implemented but not released) that will allow it to function nicely with the GHC_PACKAGE_PATH environment variable, but I'm uncertain if that's true.
Michael