On 12.03 01:47, Shannon -jj Behrens wrote:
monad. Perhaps controversially, I've continued to use |> in a bunch of places that the monad didn't get rid of because I think it's more readable, but I'm still open for argument on this topic. Using the
What about using (>>>) from Control.Arrow?
-- For convenience: currTokType :: ParseContext -> TokenType currTokType ctx = ctx |> currTok |> tokenType
currTokType = currTok >>> tokenType
currTokValue :: ParseContext -> String currTokValue ctx = ctx |> currTok |> tokenValue
currTokValue = currTok >>> tokenValue
-- Create the final output string given a ParseContext. consolidateOutput :: ParseContext -> String consolidateOutput ctx = ctx |> output |> reverse |> concat
consolidateOutput = output >>> reverse >>> concat and so on. - Einar Karttunen