Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Why binding to existing widget toolkits doesn't make any sense

Perhaps I should have been more precise: How do you define "layout" and "interaction semantics" in such a way that the former has a *necessarily* direct, enormous impact on the latter? HTML/CSS is a perfect example of how one can decouple a model of content from the presentation of that content. The developer writes the content model and the controller, while UX guys or designers get to decide how it looks. Regards, John A. De Goes N-BRAIN, Inc. The Evolution of Collaboration http://www.n-brain.net | 877-376-2724 x 101 On Feb 2, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Achim Schneider wrote:

"John A. De Goes" wrote:

...

How do you define "layout" in a way that has a "direct an enormous effect on interaction semantics"???

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faJ8N0giqzw

-- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or quoting of this signature prohibited.

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe