On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Felipe Almeida Lessa < felipe.lessa@gmail.com> wrote:
If you're asking about performance, as in "is there a problem that can be solved in O(f(n)) time in Java but not in Haskell-sans-IO-and-ST?", then it becomes a harder question. I'm not sure what the answer is.
Cheers,
-- Felipe.
</lurk> an interesting question emerges: even though i may be able to implement an algorithm with O(f(n)) in Haskell, and write a program that is O(g(n)) < O(f(n)) in C++ or Java... could Haskell be said to be more efficient if time spent programming / maintaining Haskell is << C++ or Java?? i'm still trying to learn Haskell, but it seems to me to be *much* less verbose than C and it's derivatives, and while jumping through monads just to print to a screen or write a file seems a small expence to pay to be able to express what you want easier... justin <lurk> -- * The wise man said: "Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience." * As a programmer, it is your job to put yourself out of business. What you do today can be automated tomorrow. ~Doug McIlroy No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible. --- CFO: “What happens if we train people and they leave?” CTO: “What if we don’t and they stay?”