I have actually been thinking about a similar thing, but on the "group" subject.
One can actually group things in many ways, such as groupBy (==) , so
that groupBy (==) [1,2,1,2] should give
[[1,1],[2,2]]. Of course other ideas are possible.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Brent Yorgey
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 05:39:55PM +0100, Gianfranco Alongi wrote:
A very nice initiative I must say; although the page should contain the usual explanation for why such a split method can't be universal. That is, add the same explanation you give every time; but to the page.
Good idea; I've added a list of possible ways to split, both to give people ideas for code to write, and to demonstrate why it's impossible to come up with one 'best' split function.
vixey has already added some code, but we need more!
-Brent _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- Patience is the last resort for those unable to take action