Re: [Haskell-cafe] curious about sum

What do you mean by "literals are strict"? Strictness is a semantic property of functions, and while literals can be overloaded to be functions I don't know what you mean. On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Keith Sheppard wrote:

Haskell's numeric literals are strict. You wouldn't want that to change right? It seems to me that having sum and product be strict is consistent with this.

-Keith

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:

...

On 17 Jun 2009, at 13:32, Yitzchak Gale wrote:

...

Henk-Jan van Tuyl wrote:

...

reverse maximum minimum

Oh yes, please fix those also!

import Prelude.Strict?

Honestly, these functions are ones that I've *deffinately* used lazy versions of, in fact, in the cases of minimum/maximum I've even used ones that are super-lazy and parallel using unamb.

It would be extremely odd to randomly decide "most people would want this to be strict" based on no knowledge of what they're actually doing.  Instead, why don't we stand by the fact that haskell is a lazy language, and that the functions we get by default are lazy, and then write a strict prelude as I suggest above to complement the lazy version.

Bob _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

-- keithsheppard.name _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe