13 Oct
2008
13 Oct
'08
4:40 p.m.
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Andrew,
Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 12:15:04 AM, you wrote:
people that make critique on haskell type classes, don't take into account that it's unlike C++ templates, implemented via run-time dictionaries and other modules may define new instances
Personally, I have no clue how C++ templates work [yet]. (As in, I'm
they are known as generics in java/c#
I don't know C#, and when I did Java, generics didn't exist yet. [Eiffel has a feature of the same name, but I don't think it's related - certainly not in implementation anyway.]