12 Feb
2006
12 Feb
'06
9:44 a.m.
Hello Juan, Sunday, February 12, 2006, 5:22:46 PM, you wrote: JCAB> The only programs it would break are those that specify it at the end JCAB> (they'd require an extra "return ()", right? JCAB> This brings me to wonder also if it'd be possible for the compilers JCAB> to add a little bit more smarts to the "do" notation syntax, so that JCAB> it'll add the return () at the end if it's missing ... and break code like this: readFile name = do h <- openFile name hGetContents h -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulatz@HotPOP.com