Re: [Haskell-cafe] "Lower case" infix type operator variables

it was changed in 7.6 even! On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Erik Hesselink wrote:

Hi Joseph,

The type operator type variable used to be possible, but this was changed in (I think) 7.8. See the discussion in threads [0] and [1]. There were some proposals for alternate syntax for operator type variables, but I don't think any of them were implemented. Currently, the best you can do is infix textual names, something like:

constA :: Arrow arr => b -> (a `arr` b)

Erik

[0] http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2012-January/021611.h... [1] http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2012-September/022845...

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Joseph Abrahamson wrote:

...

I spent a few moments confused by the fact the TypeOperators was insufficient to allow the following type to be parsed

constA :: Arrow (~>) => b -> (a ~> b)

My current intuition is that since I *can* write things like

newtype (~>) a b = A (a -> b)

there is clashing in the type operator space for “upper case” and “lower case” identifiers. Is it possible or advisable to mitigate this clash and provide some syntax for “type operator variables”? Joseph

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe