
17 Nov
2009
17 Nov
'09
4:46 a.m.
Excerpts from Kalman Noel's message of Tue Nov 17 07:47:14 +0100 2009:
Michael Snoyman schrieb:
control-monad-failure provides a basic notion of failure which does not commit to any concrete representation. It is just a version of the MonadError class without the annoying bits.
class MonadFailure e m where failure :: e -> m a
Why is it called "MonadFailure" (specifically, what's the "Monad" bit doing there)?
Because of 'Monad m' being a superclass of 'MonadFailure e m'. Here is the class: class Monad m => MonadFailure e m where failure :: e -> m a -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr