Re: [Haskell-cafe] Slow IO?

On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 06:30 -0400, Gwern Branwen wrote:

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Steve wrote:

...

Hi, I'm tackling a Sphere Online Judge tutorial question where it tests how fast you can process input data. You need to achieve at least 2.5MB of input data per second at runtime (on an old machine running ghc 6.6.1). This is probably close to the limit of Haskell's ability.

https://www.spoj.pl/problems/INTEST/

I can see that 24 haskell programmers have solved it, but most are very close to the 8 secs limit (and 6/24 are even over the limit!).

Here's my code. It fails with a "time limit exceeded" error. (I think it would calculate the correct result, eventually).

module Main where

import qualified Data.List as DLi import qualified System.IO as SIO

main :: IO () main = do line1 <- SIO.hGetLine SIO.stdin let k = read $ words line1 !! 1 s <- SIO.hGetContents SIO.stdin print $ count s k

count :: String -> Int -> Int count s k = DLi.foldl' foldFunc 0 (map read $ words s) where foldFunc :: Int -> Int -> Int foldFunc a b | mod b k == 0 = a+1 | otherwise = a

I tried using Data.ByteString but then found that 'read' needs a String, not a ByteString. I tried using buffered IO, but it did not make any difference.

Any suggestions on how to speed it up?

Regards, Steve

Did you try readInt? http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/bytestring/0.9.1.4/doc/html/Data...

Thanks. I didn't see readInt. It allows me to use ByteString and produce results about 10 times faster than System.IO hGetContents. It makes me wonder why the System.IO functions have not been replaced by Data.ByteString. My program runs in 8.56 seconds (its over the 8 secs limit but it was accepted). I compared the top 10 C/C++ results against the top 10 Haskell results: C/C++ ~0.4 secs Haskell ~5.0 secs So it looks like Haskell is ~13 slower for IO than C/C++, even (I assume) when using Data.ByteString or other speed-up tricks. Steve