
Hi Li-yao,
Thanks for all your useful comments.
Maybe we have different ideas about what genericity is all about.
I think that my type class foe `to1 is pretty generic.
And yes, it is not about ADTs.
Thanks again
Luc
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 6:38 PM Li-yao Xia
This doesn't sound like a use case for generics then. Just to spare you the trouble of following a red herring.
On 9/10/2020 12:26 PM, YueCompl wrote:
Li-yao, thanks for the pointer. And my case is not really about ADTs, but to introspect the arguments an arbitrary Haskell function takes, including how many and what type each argument is, so as to extract proper values from a given ArgsPack, then call that Haskell function with those values as args it expects.
I'm not sure at a glance, that generics-eot has demonstrated how to obtain argument list with type info for a function, and will look into the details as I can.
Thanks with regards, Compl
On 2020-09-10, at 23:08, Li-yao Xia
mailto:lysxia@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Compl,
I couldn't tell what's generic (in the sense of GHC.Generics) about this example. A clearer example would be to give two applications with different algebraic data types, and to show how they consist of the same boilerplate, where the differences are only due to the differing numbers of fields and constructors.
As for tutorials on generics, a good starting point might be generics-eot. Its documentation comes with a series of tutorials:
https://generics-eot.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
Li-yao
On 9/10/2020 9:44 AM, YueCompl via Haskell-Cafe wrote:
Dear Cafe, I'm tinkering with the idea for arbitrary Haskell functions to be easily called from scripting code, I see auto derive with GHC.Generics might be the most promising tool, but I'm lost after read https://wiki.haskell.org/GHC.Generics and hackage docs. I have no clue so far with how to start with it. Specifically I want the section highlighted in blue get auto generated, within the following `runghc` ready example: ``` {-# LANGUAGEBangPatterns#-} moduleMain where importPrelude importGHC.Generics importData.Dynamic -- * minimum data structures as interface with scripting code typeAttrKey=String dataAttrVal=NilValue |IntValue!Integer |StrValue!String deriving(Eq,Ord,Typeable) instanceShowAttrValwhere show NilValue="nil" show (IntValue!x)=show x show (StrValue!x)=show x dataArgsPack=ArgsPack{ positional'args::[AttrVal] ,keyword'args::[(AttrKey,AttrVal)] } instanceSemigroupArgsPackwhere (ArgsPackp1 kw1)<>(ArgsPackp2 kw2)=ArgsPack(p1 ++p2)(kw1 ++kw2) instanceMonoidArgsPackwhere mempty =ArgsPack[][] classCallableawhere call::a->ArgsPack->(AttrVal->IO())->IO() -- * functions to be callable from scripting code newtypeAssert=Assert( Expect->MaybeTarget->Message->IOMessage ) typeExpect=AttrVal typeTarget=AttrVal typeMessage=String instanceCallableAssertwhere -- can this get auto-generated ? with https://wiki.haskell.org/GHC.Generics call (Assert!assert)(ArgsPack!args !kwargs)!exit =do (expect,target,message)<-parseApk result <-assert expect target message exit $StrValueresult where parseApk::IO(Expect,MaybeTarget,Message) parseApk =goParse (Left"missing arg: expect",Nothing,Left"missing arg: message") args kwargs goParse (got'expect,got'target,got'message)[][]=casegot'expect of Leftmsg ->error msg Rightexpect ->casegot'message of Leftmsg ->error msg Rightmessage ->return (expect,got'target,message) goParse (got'expect,got'target,got'message)args' ((name,val):kwargs') =casename of "expect"->casegot'expect of Right{}->error "duplicate arg: expect" Left{}->goParse (Rightval,got'target,got'message)args' kwargs' "target"->casegot'target of Just{}->error "duplicate arg: target" Nothing->goParse (got'expect,Justval,got'message)args' kwargs' "message"->casegot'message of Right{}->error "duplicate arg: message" Left{}->caseval of StrValuemessage -> goParse (got'expect,got'target,Rightmessage)args' kwargs' _ ->error "bad arg type for: message" _ ->error "unexpected keyword args" goParse (got'expect,got'target,got'message)(val :args')[]= casegot'expect of Left{}->goParse (Rightval,got'target,got'message)args' [] Right{}->casegot'target of Nothing->goParse (got'expect,Justval,got'message)args' [] Just{}->casegot'message of Left{}->caseval of StrValuemessage -> goParse (got'expect,got'target,Rightmessage)args' [] _ ->error "bad arg type for: message" Right{}->error "extranous positional args" -- mockup & test out main::IO() main = call (Assertassert) (ArgsPack[IntValue333,StrValue"as good will"] [("target",IntValue333)] ) $\result ->putStrLn $"Got result: "<>show result -- | plain Haskell function meant to be easily called by scripting code assert::Expect->MaybeTarget->Message->IOMessage assert !expect !maybeTarget !message =casemaybeTarget of Nothing->return $"* assertion not applicable: "<>message Justtarget ->ifexpect ==target thenreturn $"* assertion passed: "<>message elseerror $"* assertion failed: "<>message ``` I tried to understand how * The compiler can provide a default generic implementation for |parseJSON < https://hackage.haskell.org/package/aeson-1.5.4.0/docs/Data-Aeson.html#v:par... |. is implemented in [aeson](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/aeson) and it is overwhelming to me at the moment ... Is there easier scaffold template for me to start with GHC.Generics? Or there're even better techniques to achieve my final goal? Help please! Best regards, Compl _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.
-- __~O -\ <, (*)/ (*) reality goes far beyond imagination