Re: [Haskell-cafe] A new cabal odissey: cabal-1.8 breaking its own neck by updating its dependencies

On 9/11/10 3:43 PM, Daniel Fischer wrote:

...

- is there a "specification" of which are the "core" packages?

"core" as in *do not update*? Basically, what comes with GHC shouldn't be updated. Though I heard updating Cabal was okay.

I tried updating Cabal once (recently) and it broke things in the same way. FWIW. -- Live well, ~wren