Hi, On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic < ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com> wrote:
I am pleased to announce a new release of the graphviz package for Haskell, which provides bindings to the GraphViz [1] suite of tools.
Nice work! As the way of defining an attribute for a specific grouping of
nodes/edges/subgraphs is to have them all listed after the attribute
definition (whereas those beforehand do not have this attribute), the imperative nature of the Dot language does not allow us to split these statements up as we currently do.
[3] http://graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html
As such, I'm asking which of the following two choices people would prefer: 1. Follow upstream so that it can fully parse a Dot graph 2. Keep it as it is, so that it is possible to consider all edges, etc. easily.
I would vote for the second one since I think that is the most widely used feature of this package. Cheers, Zsolt