Thanks for all the responses.
@Ivan
I couldn't yet find an option in stack to point to local source tarballs.
Custom snapshots at least currently only support Hackage packages and that
was the closest I found.
I briefly looked into `stack unpack <package>`, that might indeed provide a
workable solution. Although options other than the list of packages would
have to be duplicated between my "normal" stack.yaml and the one I use to
enable offline compilation.
@Tobias
I already thought about that, yackage sounds like a package that would help
implement it. Not sure if I like that option very much though.
@David
Not sure if I get your proposal.
Running `stack build --prefetch --dry-run` lists my local packages as
"Would build". How would I get source tarballs of my dependencies and how
would I build them on an offline machine?
Best
Jan
David Turner
Hi,
Does
stack build --prefetch --dry-run
get close to what you want? That seems to download all the necessary packages, and by using stack you get the ability to share compiled dependencies between packages.
Cheers,
David
On 24 November 2016 at 06:57, Jan von Löwenstein < jan.loewenstein@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Consider the following use case: I have to ship a Haskell application as source, bundled with its dependencies and a script that can produce the binary on a machine without internet connectivity.
Is that possible with Stack or Cabal? Any pointers would be much appreciated.
Ideally I would like to build each dependency package individually. That way I could cache results per Haskell package and don't need to rebuild dependencies until they actually change.
Best Jan
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.