
15 Oct
2007
15 Oct
'07
10:50 a.m.
Yes, exactly, but how does one call the way of programming without monads / do notation then, explicitly passing the "object"? Does this approach have a name? Or just "non-monadic style"? Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
Actually I stopped bothering long ago about 'understanding monads'.
I think that's a shame, because when I wrote the source code myself to get from a pure functional approach (passing the "object" from function to function as an extra argument) to a monadic approach,
where "monadic" is still "pure functional", but somehow tries to hide that