Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: The Typeclassopedia, and request for feedback

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Fischer wrote:

Hah, seems I'm the first to point out a flaw in it:

Bottom of page 13: "Also, note that although _ >> m = m would be a type-correct implementation of (>>), it" The remainder of the sentence is missing.

Sorry, I've already reported this one, it's waiting for moderation on the blog post ;). -- Felipe.