26 Sep
2011
26 Sep
'11
1:54 p.m.
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 18:52 +0300, Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Chris Smith wrote:
class Ord a => Range a where...
Before adding a completely new Range class, I would suggest considering Paul Johnson's Ranged-sets package:
Well, my goal was to try to find a minimal and simple answer that doesn't break anything or add more complexity. So I don't personally find the idea of adding multiple *more* type classes appealing. In any case, it doesn't make much difference either way. It's clear that no one is going to be satisfied here, so there's really no point in making any change. In fact, if this conversation leads to changes, it looks like it will just break a bunch of code and make Haskell harder to use. -- Chris Smith