
24 Sep
2007
24 Sep
'07
8:49 p.m.
Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi
lengthNat [1..] > 10
Couldn't be clearer, and can be made to work perfectly. If anyone does want to pick up the lazy naturals work, I can send over the code (or write it yourself - its not hard!)
Um... isn't a lazy natural just a list with no data, where the list length encodes a number?