What can we say to that? I'm well practiced in handling those who reject types outright (Python programmers), those who reject what is too different (C programmers), those who can not live without objects (Java programmers), those who insist we must move everything to message passing (Erlang programmers). It's not too often that I meet an embittered LISP programmer -- one who's well acquainted with a bold and well-supported community of functional programmers whose shooting star soon descended to dig a smoking hole in the ground. Who's to say Haskell (and the more typeful languages in general) do not find themselves in the same situation in just a few years' time? Is avoiding success at all costs really enough? -- Jason Dusek