6 Oct
2010
6 Oct
'10
4:36 p.m.
On 10/06/10 13:32, steffen wrote:
A slightly different suggestion from Simon PJ and myself (we agreed on something syntax-related :-) is the following: \case 1 -> f 2 -> g ... \case { 1 -> f; 2 -> g } +1
I like this because it has exactly the same properties of Max's case-of, but is shorter and still reads with sense. +1
Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe +1...million
Cheers, Greg