I used cabal install xmobar --flags="all_extensions" . Is it true that every package installed from hackage should not install any package, which already exists in the global with the same version number , in the local db? Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Wednesday 09 March 2011 00:34:39, qiqi wrote:
The problem is solved! I found out that both global and local package db get directory-1.1.0.0 and process-1.0.1.5. I unregistered them and other caused broken packages in the local package db.
D'oh, I should've seen that.
Then I successfully installed back hmatrix, ghc-mod, happy and etc. It seems that xmobar will install directory-1.1.0.0 again in the local package db.
That's not good. And it doesn't seem to do that here:
$ cabal install xmobar --dry-run Resolving dependencies... In order, the following would be installed (use -v for more details): stm-2.2.0.1 syb-0.3 X11-1.5.0.0 utf8-string-0.3.6 xmobar-0.12
What does
$ cabal install xmobar --dry-run -v3 say for you about directory?
Did you succeed in installing haddock 2.9?
That was built with the compiler (I built from source), no problems.
$ haddock --version Haddock version 2.9.2, (c) Simon Marlow 2006 Ported to use the GHC API by David Waern 2006-2008
Mine got some syntax oriented error duing cabal install haddock. But it's fine.
The same as http://haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2011-March/089902.html ? I don't know if that's been solved.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
-- View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/some-problem-with-Cabal-tp3414662p34149... Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com.